Economic Dimension of Hindutva, Part 1
The Economic Impact of British Colonial Rule on India: A Historical Perspective
The nearly two centuries of British colonial rule in India left an indelible mark on the country’s economic, social, and political fabric. Beyond the visible changes in governance and administration, British rule profoundly reshaped India’s economic structures, influencing both industrial and agricultural growth. These transformations were so significant that they even found their way into the ideological frameworks of Indian thinkers like Vinayak Damodar (Veer) Savarkar, who integrated economic considerations into his concept of Hindutva.
Savarkar’s Perspective on Economic Strength and Nationhood
For Savarkar, the economic disarray and poverty in India were not merely the consequences of colonial exploitation but also a reflection of the Hindu community’s failure to build a robust and self-sustaining economy. He argued that for India to thrive as an independent Hindu nation, it must prioritize economic strength alongside social and political development. In other words, without economic prosperity, India could not sustain itself as a powerful and independent Hindu nation. Furthermore, he believed that self-reliance and industrial growth were crucial to ensuring India’s long-term survival, free from external domination. This perspective underscores the centrality of economic prosperity in shaping India’s future.
The General Economic Landscape Under British Rule
To understand the economic impact of British colonialism, it’s essential to examine the broader historical context. Dietmar Rothermund, a Heidelberg professor, aptly describes India’s economic history as a “fascinating drama.” He outlines how India’s ancient agrarian culture was first consolidated into a vast agrarian state under the Mughals, only to be usurped by the British East India Company. This marked the beginning of a parasitic relationship where British capitalism merged with India’s agrarian economy, subjecting it to the forces of the global market.
The 20th century brought further upheaval, with world wars, global economic crises, and the unpredictability of the monsoon season shaping India’s trajectory. After independence, India sought to break free from both colonial exploitation and the constraints of a monsoon-dependent agricultural economy through rapid industrialization.
The Debate: Exploitation vs. Development
The economic impact of British rule remains a contentious topic. Indian nationalists, including figures like Dadabhai Naoroji, Romesh Chunder Dutt, and Mahadev Govind Ranade, vehemently criticized British policies for stifling India’s growth.
Some of the primary critiques included:
- High taxation on agriculture – British land policies placed an immense burden on Indian farmers.
- Discriminatory trade policies – Indian industries faced stiff competition from British manufactured goods without the benefit of protective tariffs.
- Drain of wealth – Naoroji’s “Drain Theory” asserted that India’s wealth was siphoned off to Britain, leaving the Indian population impoverished.
- Dependency on British goods – By the late 19th century, India had become Britain’s largest export market, while indigenous industries suffered due to unfair trade practices.
- Catastrophic famines – Millions perished due to food shortages and colonial policies that prioritized exports over local needs. Here, the Indian nationalists pointed to the catastrophic famines of the 1870s and 1890s and the widespread rural poverty as further evidence of colonial exploitation.
By the late 19th century, India had become the largest buyer of British goods, a major employer of British officials, and a significant contributor to Britain’s military expenses. Yet, nationalists contended that these contributions came at the cost of India’s own industrial progress. They believed that an independent India, with its pre-colonial resources, could have mirrored Japan’s rapid development.
On the other hand, British apologists highlighted the benefits of colonial rule, such as legal and administrative reforms, infrastructure development (like railways and irrigation projects), and the expansion of trade. However, these advancements often served British interests more than they benefited the Indian population.
Agriculture: The Backbone of India’s Economy
Throughout the colonial period, agriculture remained the cornerstone of India’s economy, employing the vast majority of the population. However, the sector faced significant challenges, including declining productivity and frequent famines. Between 1891 and 1947, per capita agricultural production, especially in food grains, saw a noticeable decline.
The famines of the late 19th century were particularly devastating, claiming millions of lives. For instance, the famine of 1876-77 in Madras and Mysore resulted in 3.5 million deaths, while the 1896-97 famine in Bihar and Punjab claimed 4.5 million lives. These tragedies underscored the fragility of India’s agricultural economy under colonial rule.
The Shift Toward Industrialization
Given the limitations of agriculture, Indian nationalists and policymakers increasingly viewed industrialization as the key to economic modernization. They believed that industrial progress would not only drive technological innovation but also transform agriculture, overcoming both colonial and traditional obstacles.
By the mid-20th century, the focus on industrialization became central to India’s economic policies. The goal was to reduce dependence on agriculture, create jobs, and build a self-reliant economy capable of competing on the global stage.
Final Thoughts: A Legacy of Contradictions
The economic impact of British colonial rule on India is a story of contradictions. While the British introduced infrastructure and administrative reforms, their policies often prioritized their own economic interests, leading to the exploitation of India’s resources and the impoverishment of its people. The nationalist critique, supported by figures like Naoroji and Dutt, highlights the systemic inequalities and distortions introduced by colonial rule.
At the same time, the colonial period laid the groundwork for India’s post-independence economic strategies, particularly the emphasis on industrialization. As India continues to navigate its economic future, the lessons of this colonial legacy remain relevant, reminding us of the importance of self-reliance, equitable growth, and the need to address historical injustices.
Understanding this history is crucial in assessing India’s economic evolution and the long-term consequences of colonial rule. In the words of Dr. Vera Anstey, a British economist, the results of British rule were “undoubtedly disappointing” for India’s well-being. Yet, the resilience and determination of the Indian people have allowed the country to emerge as a global economic power, striving to overcome the shadows of its colonial past.
This blog post provides a comprehensive overview of the economic impact of British colonial rule on India, blending historical analysis with contemporary relevance. It invites readers to reflect on the complexities of colonialism and its enduring legacy.
Sources:
ANSTEY, Vera. 1936. The Economic Development of India. Third Edition. Longmans, Green: London.
DUTT, Palme R. 1951. Indien Heute. Dietz Verlag Berlin.
NAOROJI, Dadabhai. 1901. Poverty and Un-British Rule in India. London: Swan Sonnenschein & Co
ROTHERMUND, Dietmar. 1985. Indiens wirtschaftliche Entwicklung. Von der Kolonialherrschaft bis zur Gegenwart. Schöningh (UTB): Paderborn.
Leave a Reply